Springdale, Arkansas May Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

By Editor
In Breed-Specific Legislation
Nov 22nd, 2010
3 Comments
3292 Views

Editor’s note: Once again, the key component in cases like these is not the breed of dog — especially since “pit bull” is not a breed and since there is no such thing as an inherently vicious breed of dog — but the fact that the dog was repeatedly free-roaming.  It sounds like Springdale needs more Animal Control enforcement to police free-roaming dogs and to cite their irresponsible owners.

Please contact the Springdale Mayor and City Council and politely inform them that breed-specific legislation in any form is ineffective, unenforceable, and unconstitutional.

From NWAhomepage.com:

Sheila Elkins says Saturday’s pit bull attack in her neighborhood was unfortunate but not unexpected.

“We’ve seen it chasing children, we’ve seen it in our backyards to where we couldn’t come out of our homes and called animal control to come take care of the problems,” Sheila said.

Police say the dog attacked Kathryn Urban and her two sons as they played in their front yard. Officers shot and killed the dog because, according to their report, it lunged at one of them.

Springdale Alderman, Mike Overton says he’d like to see pit bulls banned inside city limits.

“An attack like this one is just a good illustration of the fact that there is a real problem with certain breeds of dogs. I understand it might not necessarily be the animal’s fault. You can always say it’s the owner, but the fact is there are some breeds that are just vicious,” Overton said.

Overton, a dog owner himself, initiated a pit bull ban discussion last year and says he plans on bringing it back up at next weeks ordinance committee meeting.

…Although the attack shook her up, Sheila says she’s not sure she’d support a dog breed ban.

“I don’t think that’s quite fair, but there again we do have a responsibility to take care of our children,” she said.

3 Responses to “Springdale, Arkansas May Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls””

  1. Angela Hathcoat says:

    Pit bulls are NOT a dangerous breed of dog…any breed of dog could be considered vicious, it’s all in how these dogs are raised. I own a pit bull myself, and she has never shown any signs of being dangerous, or vicious….dogs who are raised with and shown love, will return that love. This is the most ridiculous claim I have EVER heard in my life. These dogs have been given a bad wrap, and I for one would like to see this crap stopped.

  2. Jeffery whittle says:

    Please dont make me get rid of the two sisters/protector that my daughter has. In this case let’s start making racial laws again too. Or banning human beings all together for the destructive nature of a few us. I love my family!

  3. carlene says:

    I love pittbulls they were used as nanny dogs in the war they are so loyal that they will do what is asked of them. To start a ordinance on breed specification is ridiculous when you have so many other large breeds in springdale. Why should people who enjoy and take great care of their pets have to pay for the ignorance of others. Not right just not right just.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*