<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.NoPitBullBans.com &#187; Mandatory Spay/Neuter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nopitbullbans.com/category/mandatory-spayneuter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com</link>
	<description>When wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality. --Thomas Jefferson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cypress, California May Consider Breed-Specific Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/11/30/cypress-california-may-consider-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/11/30/cypress-california-may-consider-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Pit Bull" Hysteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s note: Animal Control may maintain that there are issues with dogs in Cypress, but so-called &#8220;dog issues&#8221; are always resultant of people issues.  Since there has been no elaboration on what those issues are, we are left to surmise that they could be anything from free-roaming dogs to gangs or drugs.  Whatever the real [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/11/30/cypress-california-may-consider-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ypsilanti Township, Michigan Considering Mandatory Spay/Neuter Law for &#8220;Pit Bulls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/09/23/ypsilanti-township-michigan-considering-mandatory-spayneuter-law-for-pit-bulls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/09/23/ypsilanti-township-michigan-considering-mandatory-spayneuter-law-for-pit-bulls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=1393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s note: Please contact the Ypsilanti Township Board of Trustees here and politely inform them that since almost any medium- and large-breed dog (and I guess even Chihuahuas!) can be called a &#8220;pit bull,&#8221; though &#8220;pit bull&#8221; is not a breed, that perhaps the Humane Society of Huron Valley&#8217;s stats on &#8220;pit bulls&#8221; might be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/09/23/ypsilanti-township-michigan-considering-mandatory-spayneuter-law-for-pit-bulls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barstow, California May Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for &#8220;Pit Bulls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/26/barstow-california-may-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/26/barstow-california-may-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barstow California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=1265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Victorville Daily Press: A consultant working with Barstow to update its vicious-dog ordinance recommends that the city consider a mandatory spay-and-neuter law. But whether that law would require all dog owners to fix their animals or only to pit bull owners is up to city officials, he says. &#8230;A draft of the updated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/26/barstow-california-may-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Elected Officials Like These, Who Needs Enemies?</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/25/with-elected-officials-like-these-who-needs-enemies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/25/with-elected-officials-like-these-who-needs-enemies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Pit Bull" Hysteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollister California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heavens to murgatroid, what is becoming of this country?  On the one hand we have very power-drunk nanny-staters who push overly-bureaucratic legislation like breed bans, and on the other hand we have racist podunkers who pass the same breed-specific legislation only with a racist bent.  The former, the nanny-staters, we lobby against every day because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2010/08/25/with-elected-officials-like-these-who-needs-enemies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indianapolis, Indiana May Soon Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter for &#8220;Pit Bulls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/04/08/indianapolis-indiana-may-soon-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-for-pit-bulls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/04/08/indianapolis-indiana-may-soon-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-for-pit-bulls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Indianapolis Star: &#8230;Councilman Mike Speedy has crafted a proposal on &#8220;dangerous dogs&#8221; that he expects to submit to the full council sometime this month &#8212; and one that almost certainly will face stiff opposition. His proposal not only would require that all pit bulls in the county be spayed or neutered but also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/04/08/indianapolis-indiana-may-soon-consider-mandatory-spayneuter-for-pit-bulls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URGENT: Chicago City Council Committee to Vote on Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance March 12th!</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/03/10/urgent-chicago-city-council-committee-to-vote-on-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-march-12th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/03/10/urgent-chicago-city-council-committee-to-vote-on-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-march-12th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the AKC: Monday, March 09, 2009 The Chicago City Council Joint Committee on Finance and License &#38; Consumer Protection will hear a proposed mandatory spay/neuter ordinance at their meeting this Thursday, March 12th, 2009. It is vital that responsible dog owners and breeders attend the hearing to oppose this measure. The ordinance will require [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/03/10/urgent-chicago-city-council-committee-to-vote-on-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-march-12th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wichita, Kansas May Consider BSL/MSN and Mandatory Microchipping</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/01/24/wichita-kansas-may-consider-bslmsn-and-mandatory-microchipping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/01/24/wichita-kansas-may-consider-bslmsn-and-mandatory-microchipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Microchipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Kansas.com: Wichita&#8217;s animal control officials say they&#8217;re still struggling with aggressive and stray pit bulls despite a &#8220;dangerous dogs&#8221; law approved in 2007. A year&#8217;s worth of experience with the law has led officials to return to the City Council next Tuesday with options that include a pit bull ban, new breed-specific restrictions or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2009/01/24/wichita-kansas-may-consider-bslmsn-and-mandatory-microchipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oshkosh, Wisconsin Considers Breed-Specific Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for &#8220;Pit Bulls&#8221; and Other &#8220;Breeds&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/oshkosh-wisconsin-considers-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls-and-other-breeds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/oshkosh-wisconsin-considers-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls-and-other-breeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Northwestern: &#8220;Discussions are in the works over the possibility of requiring owners of pit bulls, and other breeds, to meet specific guidelines. Paul Spiegel, the city of Oshkosh’s Health Department Director, has been working with other city staff members on the wording of a draft ordinance for the breed-specific legislation, which would require [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/oshkosh-wisconsin-considers-breed-specific-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance-for-pit-bulls-and-other-breeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Riverside County, California Considers Mandatory Spay/Neuter and Microchipping Law</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/riverside-county-california-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-and-microchipping-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/riverside-county-california-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-and-microchipping-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Microchipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat Fanciers&#8217; Association Legislative ALERT Forwarding encouraged List and Riverside fanciers &#8211; sorry this is so long and so sudden. We just received word about TOMORROW&#8217;S [Dec. 16, 2008] meeting of the Riverside County CA Board of Supervisors &#8211; thanks to Concerned Dog Owners of California. An ordinance will beintroduced, based on previous proposals but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/12/15/riverside-county-california-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-and-microchipping-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada Considers Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/09/13/clark-county-las-vegas-nevada-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/09/13/clark-county-las-vegas-nevada-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Differential Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Spay/Neuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pet Limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Fox 5 News in Las Vegas: &#8220;Clark County [Las Vegas] Animal Control officials want the animal population regulated, and they will be seeking a law to ensure pets are spayed and neutered. At 6:30 p.m. Thursday, the Clark County Animal Control Advisory Board will hold a meeting at the Desert Breeze Community Center to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/2008/09/13/clark-county-las-vegas-nevada-considers-mandatory-spayneuter-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

