<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why BSL is Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nopitbullbans.com/why-bsl-is-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com</link>
	<description>When wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality. --Thomas Jefferson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stop Messing With Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/why-bsl-is-unconstitutional/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stop Messing With Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?page_id=34#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] And when the Houston Chronicle prints what amounts to an op-ed (&#8221;Ban on Pitbulls? You can&#8217;t in Texas&#8220;) that slanders innocent bully breeds, shows the picture of a Labrador or shepherd insinuating that it is a &#8220;pitbull,&#8221; and highlights the seeming ease with which a town in Colorado passed a &#8220;pitbull&#8221; ban last month, we can smell the conspiracy in the air. And really why should the bought-off media, the animal rights groups, or politicians change tack when it has been so easy, in some places, to negate 14th amendment rights to life, liberty, and property, to equal protection, and due process under the law?? And what is local and state government&#8217;s vehicle for taking away inalienable rights? Hysteria and the slander of innocent breeds of dog by the local media, which, you have to admit is pretty base. Indeed, the time of the newspaper as watchdog is long gone. It&#8217;s more accurate to say that the media is now complicit in the conspiracies they ought to be exposing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And when the Houston Chronicle prints what amounts to an op-ed (&#8221;Ban on Pitbulls? You can&#8217;t in Texas&#8220;) that slanders innocent bully breeds, shows the picture of a Labrador or shepherd insinuating that it is a &#8220;pitbull,&#8221; and highlights the seeming ease with which a town in Colorado passed a &#8220;pitbull&#8221; ban last month, we can smell the conspiracy in the air. And really why should the bought-off media, the animal rights groups, or politicians change tack when it has been so easy, in some places, to negate 14th amendment rights to life, liberty, and property, to equal protection, and due process under the law?? And what is local and state government&#8217;s vehicle for taking away inalienable rights? Hysteria and the slander of innocent breeds of dog by the local media, which, you have to admit is pretty base. Indeed, the time of the newspaper as watchdog is long gone. It&#8217;s more accurate to say that the media is now complicit in the conspiracies they ought to be exposing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bridgeton, New Jersey Possible BSL</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/why-bsl-is-unconstitutional/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bridgeton, New Jersey Possible BSL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?page_id=34#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] So, again, here we have a person who is the president of the city council and he is admitting that the breed ban he supports is illegal since if there are friendly &#8220;pitbulls&#8221; as Salvatore has admitted, then any ban of bully breeds will be a violation of equal protection rights afforded citizens under the 14th amendment, which states that some similarly-circumstanced citizens (bully breed owners) cannot be deprived of their property (their dogs) unless it can be proven that the breed is inherently vicious. But Salvatore just acknowledged there are &#8220;pitbulls&#8221; that are not vicious, and therefore any BSL would violate equal protection rights, and would be illegal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, again, here we have a person who is the president of the city council and he is admitting that the breed ban he supports is illegal since if there are friendly &#8220;pitbulls&#8221; as Salvatore has admitted, then any ban of bully breeds will be a violation of equal protection rights afforded citizens under the 14th amendment, which states that some similarly-circumstanced citizens (bully breed owners) cannot be deprived of their property (their dogs) unless it can be proven that the breed is inherently vicious. But Salvatore just acknowledged there are &#8220;pitbulls&#8221; that are not vicious, and therefore any BSL would violate equal protection rights, and would be illegal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Old Kentucky Home?</title>
		<link>http://www.nopitbullbans.com/why-bsl-is-unconstitutional/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>www.NoPitbullBans.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Old Kentucky Home?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nopitbullbans.com/?page_id=34#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] If so, you can start by fighting this horrific ordinance. If you live in Louisville, find your councilman or woman by clicking here. And even if you don&#8217;t live in Louisville, let them know what you think of this ordinance and its negation of so many of our constitutional rights (find out which amendments of the constitution are being negated by clicking here for breed-specific legislation and here for mandatory microchipping and strictured spay/neuter) by sending your respectful letters here (and just so you know before you vote tomorrow, Neville Blackmore, candidate for Louisville Metro Council 7 is for breed-specific legislation). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If so, you can start by fighting this horrific ordinance. If you live in Louisville, find your councilman or woman by clicking here. And even if you don&#8217;t live in Louisville, let them know what you think of this ordinance and its negation of so many of our constitutional rights (find out which amendments of the constitution are being negated by clicking here for breed-specific legislation and here for mandatory microchipping and strictured spay/neuter) by sending your respectful letters here (and just so you know before you vote tomorrow, Neville Blackmore, candidate for Louisville Metro Council 7 is for breed-specific legislation). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

