www.NoPitBullBans.com

www.NoPitBullBans.com

    • Archives
    • Disclaimer
    • Link Feed
    • Links
    • Other
      • For Those Harassed by Unconstitutional Census Workers
    • Pages
      • About
      • Administrative Hearings
      • AKC Sample Anti-BSL Letter
      • Debunking Dogsbite.org
      • Debunking Merritt Clifton’s “Statistics”
      • Dispelling Pit Bull Urban Mythology
      • How “Dangerous” Dog Registries are Unconstitutional and Dangerous in and of Themselves
      • How Dangerous Dog Laws Can Be Deadly
      • How Mandatory Microchipping can be Dangerous
      • PETA Supports “Pit Bull” Bans
      • Pit Bull is Not a Breed
      • Position Statement on Dog Licensure
      • What is Pet Guardianship?
      • Why BSL is Unconstitutional
      • Mandatory Spay/Neuter and Microchipping
      • The “Grandfather” Clause
      • The Rational Basis Test
      • About CDC Bite Stats
      • Quotes from Animal Rights Activists
Illustration of a bird flying.
  • Another Anti-“Pit Bull” Ruling from Another Kangaroo Court?

    Another Anti-“Pit Bull” Ruling from Another Kangaroo Court?

    Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.   A guy walks into a court room along with his poser attorney, presents a purposely weak case, and actually sets a precedent for the very thing he claims to be fighting against.   Perhaps this “joke” will ring a bell if I bring it a little…

    January 24, 2013
  • A Little Vindication for the Dog Lobby

    A Little Vindication for the Dog Lobby

    A few years ago, when there was rampant fallout and internet spewing against Michael Vick, I (gulp) argued for Vick’s due process rights — i.e. that he not be tried in the court of public opinion, but rather that he be tried in a court of law.   I even went so far as to…

    January 24, 2013
  • Webb City, Missouri to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance Tonight!

    Webb City, Missouri to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance Tonight!

    Update: Given that Joplin, Missouri was devastated by a horrific tornado over the weekend and that Joplin neighbors Webb City, it is doubtful that Webb City will be having a council meeting tonight as scheduled.   The breed-specific ordinance will, of course, still be under consideration so please keep vigilant.   Our ongoing prayers go…

    May 23, 2011
  • Manton, Michigan to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Manton, Michigan to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Editor’s note: If a resident’s dog was attacked by a “pit bull” (though “pit bull” is not a breed) then the issue is a free-roaming or uncontained dog problem, not a breed problem since the same scenario is possible with any breed of dog.   Please contact the Manton City Commission here and politely inform…

    April 14, 2011
  • Xenia, Ohio to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance Tonight!

    Xenia, Ohio to Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance Tonight!

    Editor’s note: Once again a city points a finger at breed (though “pit bull” is not a breed) instead of identifying the real threat: free-roaming dogs.   Please contact the Xenia City Council as soon as possible and politely inform them that breed-specific legislation (BSL) is ineffective, unenforceable, and unconstitutional. (For those writing letters, consider…

    April 14, 2011
  • Dispelling “Pit Bull” Urban Mythology

    Dispelling “Pit Bull” Urban Mythology

    For about 30 years, myths about so-called “pit bulls” (though “pit bull” is not a breed) have been disseminated via hearsay, anecdote, and even the media.   But these myths are just that: stories of invention.   For instance, we have countless times read articles in the media wherein the author, a local, or even…

    April 12, 2011
  • Kirksville, Missouri Passes Breed-Specific Legislation Much to the Chagrin of Reasonable, Thinking People

    Kirksville, Missouri Passes Breed-Specific Legislation Much to the Chagrin of Reasonable, Thinking People

    Editor’s note: While our thanks go to Mayor Kuhns for voting against BSL, the rest of the Council appears to have been hellbent on ignoring the overwhelming evidence of the inefficacy of breed-specific legislation, instead subscribing to the long-debunked urban myths, skewed statistics, and junk science of the opposition.   Kirksville itself defines the “pit…

    March 25, 2011
  • Seward County, Kansas May Consider Repeal of 20-Year Old “Pit Bull” Ban

    Seward County, Kansas May Consider Repeal of 20-Year Old “Pit Bull” Ban

    Editor’s note: It is unfortunate that there is so much disinformation out there.   City councils and city attorneys are repeatedly misinformed by those with an agenda about the supposed effectiveness and constitutionality of breed-specific legislation (BSL).   The constant stream of repealed BSL nationally and internationally of late illustrates the ineffectiveness of BSL, and…

    March 25, 2011
  • Elkader, Iowa May Consider Breed Restrictions

    Elkader, Iowa May Consider Breed Restrictions

    Editor’s note: The Hopkinton incident illustrates the danger, not of a specific breed, but of dogs that are constantly penned, unsocialized, and abused.   If Elkader seeks to be proactive, they should do what Hopkinton didn’t: respond in a timely manner to calls from citizens about possible animal abuse.   Folks want to point a…

    March 25, 2011
  • Beatrice, Nebraska Considering Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Beatrice, Nebraska Considering Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Editor’s note: A breed-specific ordinance, whether an outright ban or breed-specific restrictions like Beatrice is considering, is still ineffective, unenforceable, and unconstitutional.   And while DNA tests (which are not at all as reliable as the public has been made to believe and certainly not enough to withstand a legal challenge) have been proposed as…

    March 25, 2011
←Previous Page
1 … 23 24 25 26 27 … 57
Next Page→

www.NoPitBullBans.com

Proudly powered by WordPress