Month: December 2010

  • Several Residents Lobby for Illegal “Pit Bull” Ban in Van, Texas

    Several Residents Lobby for Illegal “Pit Bull” Ban in Van, Texas

    Editor’s note: There have been a few articles about some of Van’s citizens wanting to pass a “pit bull” ban, but I have yet to see an article take note of the fact that Texas has a statewide prohibition of breed-specific legislation: § 822.047.   LOCAL REGULATION OF DANGEROUS DOGS.   A county or municipality…

  • Really Denver? Really???

    Really Denver?  Really???

    Editor’s note: So really, Denver is going to defy the Americans with Disabilities Act to supposedly uphold their unconstitutional “pit bull” ban? (Please see article excerpted below.)   I say unconstitutional, because if you look up the 2004 case of Margolius v. The City of Denver you will see that Mr. Margolius proved that Denver’s…

  • Bristol Borough, Pennsylvania May Consider Breed-Specific Legislation in Violation of State Law

    Bristol Borough, Pennsylvania May Consider Breed-Specific Legislation in Violation of State Law

    Editor’s note:   It is of great concern any time a political representative says something like what Bristol Borough Council President Ralph DiGuiseppe told the Bucks County Courier Times: “I don’t care what the state says; my job is to protect the people and other animals. I will push for [breed-specific legislation]….” In other words,…