www.NoPitBullBans.com

www.NoPitBullBans.com

    • Archives
    • Disclaimer
    • Link Feed
    • Links
    • Other
      • For Those Harassed by Unconstitutional Census Workers
    • Pages
      • About
      • Administrative Hearings
      • AKC Sample Anti-BSL Letter
      • Debunking Dogsbite.org
      • Debunking Merritt Clifton’s “Statistics”
      • Dispelling Pit Bull Urban Mythology
      • How “Dangerous” Dog Registries are Unconstitutional and Dangerous in and of Themselves
      • How Dangerous Dog Laws Can Be Deadly
      • How Mandatory Microchipping can be Dangerous
      • PETA Supports “Pit Bull” Bans
      • Pit Bull is Not a Breed
      • Position Statement on Dog Licensure
      • What is Pet Guardianship?
      • Why BSL is Unconstitutional
      • Mandatory Spay/Neuter and Microchipping
      • The “Grandfather” Clause
      • The Rational Basis Test
      • About CDC Bite Stats
      • Quotes from Animal Rights Activists
Illustration of a bird flying.
  • Sioux City, Iowa Animal Control “Accidentally” Euthanized Couple’s “Pit Bulls” After Ban Goes into Effect

    Sioux City, Iowa Animal Control “Accidentally” Euthanized Couple’s “Pit Bulls” After Ban Goes into Effect

    From KMEG channel 14 in Iowa: Sioux City’s pit bull ban went into full swing on March 21st, the deadline for owners to register and microchip their animals. Since that date Cindy Rarrit with Animal Control says her department has impounded more than 10 pit bulls from owners who didn’t follow the rules. “They are…

    March 27, 2009
  • Norwalk, Ohio Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Norwalk, Ohio Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    From the Norwalk Reflector: …After a lengthy discussion, council asked Law Director Stuart O’Hara to prepare two versions of the resolution for consideration at the next meeting one with language identifying all pit bulls as vicious dogs and another without labeling any breed as vicious and is based solely on a dog’s behavior.

    March 26, 2009
  • Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania May Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania May Consider Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    From KDKA channel 2 in Pittsburgh: …Pittsburgh City Councilman Bruce Kraus says the city will consider tighter controls [on pit bulls].

    March 25, 2009
  • Saginaw, Michigan to Consider Possible “Pit Bull” and Rottweiler Ban

    Saginaw, Michigan to Consider Possible “Pit Bull” and Rottweiler Ban

    From mlive.com: …Saginaw City Councilman William G. Scharffe wants the city attorney to see if his community can ban dangerous dogs…

    March 11, 2009
  • URGENT: Chicago City Council Committee to Vote on Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance March 12th!

    URGENT: Chicago City Council Committee to Vote on Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance March 12th!

    From the AKC: Monday, March 09, 2009 The Chicago City Council Joint Committee on Finance and License & Consumer Protection will hear a proposed mandatory spay/neuter ordinance at their meeting this Thursday, March 12th, 2009. It is vital that responsible dog owners and breeders attend the hearing to oppose this measure.

    March 10, 2009
  • URGENT: Illinois Crop/Dock and Breeder Regulations Bills to Be Heard on March 10 and March 11!

    URGENT: Illinois Crop/Dock and Breeder Regulations Bills to Be Heard on March 10 and March 11!

    From the AKC: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 The AKC urges all responsible dog owners and breeders to call or email your state legislators TODAY regarding two important pieces of legislation that are scheduled for consideration on Tuesday, March 11 and Wednesday, March 12, 2009. It is crucial that constituents communicate their opposition to these measures…

    March 10, 2009
  • Opelousas, Louisiana Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Opelousas, Louisiana Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    From the Daily World: …Alderman Reggie Tatum said the city also needs to update its ordinances to deal with pit bulls and other dangerous animals.

    March 10, 2009
  • Wichita, Kansas May Consider BSL/MSN and Mandatory Microchipping

    Wichita, Kansas May Consider BSL/MSN and Mandatory Microchipping

    From Kansas.com: Wichita’s animal control officials say they’re still struggling with aggressive and stray pit bulls despite a “dangerous dogs” law approved in 2007. A year’s worth of experience with the law has led officials to return to the City Council next Tuesday with options that include a pit bull ban, new breed-specific restrictions or…

    January 24, 2009
  • Washington D.C. Councilman to Propose Breed-Specific Ordinance….Again

    Washington D.C. Councilman to Propose Breed-Specific Ordinance….Again

    From The DC Examiner: Year after year, Ward 1 D.C. Councilman Jim Graham has seen his attempt to ban fireworks fizzle, his try to bar pit bulls chewed up by colleagues. But hes back at it in 2009. …”Ive introduced the pit bull legislation every session, and I am continuing in that determined pattern,” he…

    January 20, 2009
  • Montana Breed-Specific Legislation to be Considered Thursday, Jan 22

    Montana Breed-Specific Legislation to be Considered Thursday, Jan 22

    From the AKC: Montana House Bill 191“which, with little exception, seeks to prohibit the ownership, harboring, or keeping of dogs described as “pit bulls”“is scheduled for consideration by the House Local Government Committee on Thursday, January 22, at 3PM, in room 172 of the capitol building, 1301 East Sixth Avenue in Helena. The American Kennel…

    January 19, 2009
←Previous Page
1 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 57
Next Page→

www.NoPitBullBans.com

Proudly powered by WordPress