www.NoPitBullBans.com

www.NoPitBullBans.com

    • Archives
    • Disclaimer
    • Link Feed
    • Links
    • Other
      • For Those Harassed by Unconstitutional Census Workers
    • Pages
      • About
      • Administrative Hearings
      • AKC Sample Anti-BSL Letter
      • Debunking Dogsbite.org
      • Debunking Merritt Clifton’s “Statistics”
      • Dispelling Pit Bull Urban Mythology
      • How “Dangerous” Dog Registries are Unconstitutional and Dangerous in and of Themselves
      • How Dangerous Dog Laws Can Be Deadly
      • How Mandatory Microchipping can be Dangerous
      • PETA Supports “Pit Bull” Bans
      • Pit Bull is Not a Breed
      • Position Statement on Dog Licensure
      • What is Pet Guardianship?
      • Why BSL is Unconstitutional
      • Mandatory Spay/Neuter and Microchipping
      • The “Grandfather” Clause
      • The Rational Basis Test
      • About CDC Bite Stats
      • Quotes from Animal Rights Activists
Illustration of a bird flying.
  • Kirksville, Missouri to Consider “Pit Bull” Ban

    Kirksville, Missouri to Consider “Pit Bull” Ban

    March 25, 2011 update: Unfortunately, BSL passed in Kirksville.   While our thanks go to Mayor Kuhns for voting against BSL, the rest of the Council appears to have been hellbent on ignoring the overwhelming evidence of the inefficacy of breed-specific legislation, instead subscribing to the hysteria, skewed statistics, and junk science of the opposition.…

    September 2, 2010
  • What’s in a Name?

    What’s in a Name?

    What’s in a name?   Plenty.   So when animal rightists disguised as normal, rational human beings say things like this, “We needed to change the language [from “owner” of pets to “guardian”]…My feeling* was the term ‘owner’ denigrated the animal companions we share our lives with.” it sounds reasonable.   But guardianship is anything…

    August 28, 2010
  • Barstow, California May Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Barstow, California May Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    From the Victorville Daily Press: A consultant working with Barstow to update its vicious-dog ordinance recommends that the city consider a mandatory spay-and-neuter law. But whether that law would require all dog owners to fix their animals or only to pit bull owners is up to city officials, he says.

    August 26, 2010
  • With Elected Officials Like These, Who Needs Enemies?

    With Elected Officials Like These, Who Needs Enemies?

    Heavens to murgatroid, what is becoming of this country?   On the one hand we have very power-drunk nanny-staters who push overly-bureaucratic legislation like breed bans, and on the other hand we have racist podunkers who pass the same breed-specific legislation only with a racist bent.   The former, the nanny-staters, we lobby against every…

    August 25, 2010
  • Shoot First…No Consequences Later…Apparently

    Shoot First…No Consequences Later…Apparently

    Visitors to this site have frequently noted the alarming frequency with which law enforcement officers shoot dogs first and apparently have to answer no questions later.   For instance, if a law enforcement officer feels threatened by a dog, s/he apparently has the “right” to use deadly force against the animal.   But are these…

    August 25, 2010
  • Colerain Township, Ohio May Consider “Pit Bull” Restrictions

    Colerain Township, Ohio May Consider “Pit Bull” Restrictions

    Editor’s note: Again, what is a “pit bull”?   There is no such breed.   And since what folks refer to as “pit bulls” often runs the gamut of actual breeds and their mixes, it’s clear that Colerain Township has a free-roaming dog problem, not a “pit bull” problem.   As we have seen time…

    August 21, 2010
  • Batesville, Arkansas to Consider “Pit Bull” Ban

    Batesville, Arkansas to Consider “Pit Bull” Ban

    Editor’s note: Since there is no breed “pit bull” statistics from this non-existent “breed” are meaningless.   Also, while breed bans themselves have been found to be unconstitutional, banning “pit bulls” from owners who owned their dogs prior to legislation being passed is a serious ex post facto violation. From KAIT 8: …”We’ve had seven…

    August 16, 2010
  • Some Politicos Should Be Registered as Weapons

    Some Politicos Should Be Registered as Weapons

    The following excerpted opinion piece from the Halifax-Plympton Reporter, “Pit Bulls should be registered weapons,” was written by Massachusetts Republican State Committeeman Richard Greeley. (Sections of his article appear in block quotes, and my comments follow.)   You know, we expect the nanny-staters to push overly bureaucratic, bloated government-type legislation like breed bans and mandatory…

    July 27, 2010
  • Yucaipa, CA to Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Yucaipa, CA to Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    According to the San Jose Mercury News, The Yucaipa City Council has given initial approval to a proposed ordinance requiring the spaying or neutering of pit bulls. The City Council approved the ordinance’s first reading on a 4-1 vote Monday night. If approved during a second and final reading, Yucaipa residents would have 30 days…

    July 27, 2010
  • Pitchforks, Torches, and a Mob Poised for a Race War in Elgin, Illinois???

    Pitchforks, Torches, and a Mob Poised for a Race War in Elgin, Illinois???

    If you’ve been following the spate of Elgin, Illinois “pit bull” “attacks” for the last year or so, you may have found the sheer number of these incidents unbelievable.   You know, unbelievable, as in “too dubious or improbable to be believed.”   If you’ve been following our posts for the last 6 months, you…

    July 21, 2010
←Previous Page
1 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 57
Next Page→

www.NoPitBullBans.com

Proudly powered by WordPress