www.NoPitBullBans.com

www.NoPitBullBans.com

    • Archives
    • Disclaimer
    • Link Feed
    • Links
    • Other
      • For Those Harassed by Unconstitutional Census Workers
    • Pages
      • About
      • Administrative Hearings
      • AKC Sample Anti-BSL Letter
      • Debunking Dogsbite.org
      • Debunking Merritt Clifton’s “Statistics”
      • Dispelling Pit Bull Urban Mythology
      • How “Dangerous” Dog Registries are Unconstitutional and Dangerous in and of Themselves
      • How Dangerous Dog Laws Can Be Deadly
      • How Mandatory Microchipping can be Dangerous
      • PETA Supports “Pit Bull” Bans
      • Pit Bull is Not a Breed
      • Position Statement on Dog Licensure
      • What is Pet Guardianship?
      • Why BSL is Unconstitutional
      • Mandatory Spay/Neuter and Microchipping
      • The “Grandfather” Clause
      • The Rational Basis Test
      • About CDC Bite Stats
      • Quotes from Animal Rights Activists
Illustration of a bird flying.
  • Hazel Park, Michigan Considers Restrictions for “Pit Bulls”

    Hazel Park, Michigan Considers Restrictions for “Pit Bulls”

    From CandGNews.com: “City Council last week approved the first version of an ordinance that aims to regulate the ownership of dangerous animals, specifically pit bulls. The ordinance would require that anyone that owns a Staffordshire bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier or American pit bull terrier must register the animal with the city and meet certain…

    August 21, 2008
  • One Village Trustee in Rantoul, Illinois Proposes Pet Limits and the Banning of “Pit Bulls,” Rottweilers, and Dobermans

    One Village Trustee in Rantoul, Illinois Proposes Pet Limits and the Banning of “Pit Bulls,” Rottweilers, and Dobermans

    From The News-Gazette: “A Rantoul village board member wants to ban pit bulls, Rottweilers and Doberman pinschers from the village and set limits on the number of other dogs residents will be allowed to have.

    August 19, 2008
  • Manteca, California Considers Mandatory Spay Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Manteca, California Considers Mandatory Spay Neuter Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    According to the Manteca Bulletin the Manteca, California City Council will today consider, “a municipal ordinance that would make spaying and neutering of pit bull breeds mandatory in the City of Manteca with one exception – for breeding under strict conditions that require a city issued permit…

    August 18, 2008
  • Homerville, Georgia Considers “Pit Bull” Ban

    Homerville, Georgia Considers “Pit Bull” Ban

    From WALB TV: “One South Georgia City is considering an ordinance that would ban pit bulls from city limits. The ban has been a hot topic in Homerville for about a month. Mayor Carol Chambers wouldn’t talk to us about why city leaders think the ban may be necessary.”

    August 15, 2008
  • Spirit Lake, Iowa Considers Breed-Specific Regulations for “Pit Bulls”

    Spirit Lake, Iowa Considers Breed-Specific Regulations for “Pit Bulls”

    From the Estherville Daily News: “Councilmembers have agreed that they would like to allow pit bulls within the city limits with certain restrictions. All dangerous dogs, not just pit bulls, cannot be allowed to exit their kennels, pens or other enclosures without being on a leash no longer than four feet long. The dog must…

    August 15, 2008
  • Malvern, Arkansas Considers Banning “Pit Bulls”

    Malvern, Arkansas Considers Banning “Pit Bulls”

    From Malvern-Online: “A public hearing was held Aug. 11 at the City Hall Courtroom to discuss the proposed banning of pit bulldogs from the Malvern city limits. The hearing was called to order by Mayor Steve Northcutt. Concerned citizens had five minutes to discuss the ordinance.

    August 15, 2008
  • Orem, Mapleton, and Provo, Utah Consider Breed-Specific Ordinances for “Pit Bulls”

    Orem, Mapleton, and Provo, Utah Consider Breed-Specific Ordinances for “Pit Bulls”

    From The Daily Herald: “A recent pit bull attack on two men in Orem has led to talk of new regulations on the reputedly vicious dogs. But by the time the attack occurred, several Utah County cities had been quietly considering such laws for several months. Provo and Orem city staffs are studying the issue…

    August 10, 2008
  • Hall County, Nebraska Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    Hall County, Nebraska Considers Breed-Specific Ordinance for “Pit Bulls”

    From Nebraska.TV: “…Hall County officials have not used the word “ban” regarding pit bulls, but do say they want the animals regulated in some way.

    August 10, 2008
  • Allen Park, Michigan Considers Banning “Pit Bulls”

    Allen Park, Michigan Considers Banning “Pit Bulls”

    From the Detroit Free Press: “…The City Council’s Legal Affairs Committee is to meet Tuesday to consider outlawing [“pit bulls”] — and dogs that are part pit bull — after two pit bull mixes killed one of Councilwoman Beverly Kelley’s dogs and injured the other last month.

    August 5, 2008
  • Woodbury County, Iowa Board of Supervisors Considers “Pit Bull” Ban

    Woodbury County, Iowa Board of Supervisors Considers “Pit Bull” Ban

    From KTIV News: “…The Woodbury County Board of Supervisors is looking at banning pit bulls in the county. Under the proposed city ban, owners would have to register their current pets, but no new pitbulls would be allowed within city limits.”

    July 31, 2008
←Previous Page
1 … 42 43 44 45 46 … 57
Next Page→

www.NoPitBullBans.com

Proudly powered by WordPress